Perpetuals Inspect

inspect.perpetuals.io

Inspect evidence before trust.

Inspect organizes evidence, provenance, continuity, and uncertainty to help inspect digital subjects and the claims made about them. Examples include wallets, contracts, governance actors, virtual artists, pseudonymous creators, and similar digital subjects.

Why inspect?

Use the dossier before a real-world decision.

01

Music Collaboration

Before collaborating with a pseudonymous creator, inspect available Claims, Evidence, licensing history, Disputes, and Continuity Transitions.

02

DAO Contributor Review

Before delegating authority, treasury access, moderation rights, or governance responsibility, inspect available Evidence and historical participation.

03

Virtual Artist Stewardship

Before licensing, acquiring, funding, or stewarding a virtual artist, inspect stewardship history, governance transitions, rights history, model transitions, Disputes, and Missing Evidence.

No trust scores No recommendations No rankings No identity verdicts

Inspect Subject

Start with an inspectable subject, then inspect its dossier.

Enter a digital subject such as a wallet, address, contract, ENS name, DAO contributor, governance actor, virtual artist, pseudonymous creator, or AI agent. This release entry point routes into sample dossiers only; no backend lookup is performed.

Example inputs:

Inspect SubjectReview DossierExplore EvidenceExplore ContinuityReview Uncertainty

Demo subjects

Example dossiers for the inspection framework.

Rina Chroma is loaded by default as a sample inspection case. Switch between Virtual Artists Studio examples to see how the same framework handles claims, evidence, attestations, disputes, continuity, and uncertainty.

Method and limitations

How to read this dossier

Claims are statements made by or about the subject. Support states describe available profile evidence; they are not truth labels.

Attestations are statements from identified sources. A valid signature or platform record does not make the content automatically true.

Observations describe visible activity in available records. They do not infer motive, quality, safety, or suitability.

Evidence items are source artifacts, records, transactions, files, posts, statements, registry entries, or placeholders for unavailable records.

Continuity transitions describe links and changes between identifiers, roles, rights, authority, models, or stewardship states.

Missing evidence identifies records that would materially improve inspection. Absence of evidence is not treated as evidence of wrongdoing.

Inspect manifesto: No trust scores. No reputation scores. No rankings. No recommendations. No identity verdicts. No continuity verdicts. No eligibility decisions. Only inspectable evidence, explicit uncertainty, and records that can be opened, challenged, or marked missing.